Log in   •   Sign up   •   Subscribe  feed icon

An Endless Supply of Green Energy Coming from Europe: HiPER circa 2030

Plans for a nuclear fusion reactor facility are soon to be underway, with a mission to demonstrate that inertial fusion could be used as a future energy source--to power the world.

Nuclear Fusion in a Supernovae (artist's depiction)Nuclear Fusion in a Supernovae (artist's depiction)

Currently, solar and wind power are the top two renewable energy technologies. Optimistically, wind and solar power could produce, at most, 30% of the world's energy needs in the future.

Perhaps a lesser known alternative is nuclear fusion--the same process that fuels the sun and the stars. To hear its potential--a method that offers enough energy for the world's power, a limitless fuel supply, and no greenhouse gas emissions--it sounds like an ideal solution.

But while it's one of the only foreseeable methods to completely eliminate our reliance on natural gas, and reduce carbon dioxide emissions to 0%, development of a nuclear fusion reactor will take time. Actually, it already has--one of the biggest criticisms of the idea is that, after 40 years of research, there have been no significant breakthroughs. Most dishearteningly, scientists have not yet been able to contain a nuclear fusion reaction long enough to produce more energy than is required to perform the reaction.

HiPER Nuclear Reaction ChamberHiPER Nuclear Reaction ChamberHowever, one of the most exciting initiatives in nuclear fusion research, HiPER (High Power laser Energy Research facility), has recently received a grant from the European Union for 738 million euros, which will be used for the initial planning of an inertial fusion reactor, with a demonstration of the proof-of-principle planned as soon as 2010.

Fifty scientists from 15 nations are already on board the two-year-old project, with UK scientist Mike Dunne of the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory heading up the initiative. Building on 40 years of research, the team claims to have a plan to put the technology on the fast track. Their goal is to have a reactor that could start delivering power for consumer electricity in 2030.

Basically, fusion is the combination of small atomic nuclei into a larger nucleus. As Einstein showed in his famous equation E=mc², a small amount of mass can be associated with a large amount of energy. So, for example, by fusing together two isotopes of hydrogen (deuterium, which has one neutron, and tritium, which has two neutrons) to form helium, which has two neutrons, one neutron is left over. In that neutron, a small amount of mass is lost, and an enormous amount of energy is released.

The challenge to this process is that it's very difficult to get two different nuclei to get close to each other, since the electromagnetic force causes the positively charged nuclei to repel each other. However, if heated to very high temperatures, they can overcome the electromagnetic force and get a little closer to each other-close enough for the strong force to take over and fuse the nuclei. The strong force only operates on very small scales; however, it is by far the strongest of the four forces when operating in its territory.

Deuterium + TritiumDeuterium + Tritium

 

 

 

For nuclear fusion to take place in the core of the sun, the temperature only needs to reach about 10 million degrees Celsius, due to the star's enormous amount of gravitational pressure. At the much lower pressure on Earth, however, scientists need to create temperatures of more than 100 million degrees Celsius-10 times hotter than the sun.

This is the main challenge of nuclear fusion-to heat and maintain the fuel at a high enough temperature and density for a sufficient duration.

The HiPER experiment plans to achieve these extreme temperatures with a unique approach: ultra-powerful lasers. According to HiPER's Web site , some of these lasers are powerful enough to concentrate the equivalent of 10,000 times the power of the UK's national grid into a spot less than a millimeter across.

Several scientists have already been working on such lasers. However, currently the best lasers take several minutes to accumulate enough power to fire at and heat the atoms. The lasers would need to fire several times a second in a fusion reactor, and also be an order of magnitude more efficient than today's beams. In an effort to close this gap, laser research is one of the largest areas of research for the HiPER collaboration.

Working with matter at such enormous temperatures presents further challenges. At 100 million degrees, matter becomes a plasma, an electrically charged substance where the electrons move freely about, rather than being chained in orbits around the atoms. In order to keep the two hydrogen nuclei together long enough to fuse, the researchers have to confine this plasma in the center of the reactor. Because the hot plasma cannot touch the walls of the reactor (no material could withstand that temperature, and the plasma would quickly cool anyway if it did touch), confinement of plasma is another extremely difficult task.

There are a few ways scientists know how to confine plasma. Do it like the sun, and confine it with a massive amount of gravity (but like the temperature challenge, this is not possible on Earth). Another option is to use magnetic fields. This technique is currently being used in a project called International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), a 10 billion-euro reactor being built in Cadarache, France.

But HiPER is going to try another technique: inertial confinement, which can be done with a second laser. In the set-up, one laser compresses the block of atoms-called a "fuel pellet"--while another laser, like a spark plug, ignites it. Using this technique, Dunne explained that the fuel does not need to be compressed as much as it does with the other fusion methods. Inertial confinement has already been demonstrated, though not with the laser technique. Inertial confinement was also used in the hydrogen bomb, where a fission reaction created x-rays that played the role of the laser.

One of the greatest advantages of nuclear fusion is that the supply of hydrogen isotopes is endless: they are contained in sea water. According to the HiPER Web site, one cubic kilometer of seawater could supply the same amount of energy as could the world's current oil reserves. In other words, it would likely outlast humanity.

Sea water contains deuteriumSea water contains deuterium

Besides being sent to steam turbines to supply electrical power, nuclear fusion could also be used to power vehicles. The high temperatures created in the reactor could be used to drive a hydrogen production cycle, and hydrogen could be used in a new car technology.

While the process releases no carbon dioxide, the scientists explain that it will produce some low-level radioactive waste--about the same amount as the radioactive by-products from a hospital. And over the life of the fusion power plant, the amount and type of waste would be manageable.

In addition to demonstrating the feasibility of laser-driven fusion as a future energy source, the project could also allow researchers to investigate extreme conditions that cannot be produced elsewhere on Earth. For example, the 100-million-degree temperature, the billion-atmosphere pressures, and the enormous electric and magnetic fields could reveal new areas of science.

As for the cost of electric power produced by nuclear fusion, researchers are still analyzing the question. In the mid-‘90s, researchers from the US presented initial estimates for a cost of 5-8 cents per kW-hour (consistent with, or even slightly less than, current electric rates).

For now, the HiPER team is trying to move the project from the science lab to the public and political arena. They explain that the work is not defense-related, and none of their research will be classified, but published to the international science community.

According to their Web site, they plan to begin the preparatory phase of the project in early 2008, preparing for a detailed design and construction phase to start in 2011-2012. Depending on these successes, the team hopes to open the facility to testing by 2020. And as stated earlier, consumer power generation could conceivably occur in 2030.

As the team notes, nuclear fusion is not an immediate solution to the world's energy demand, but rather a long-term, sustainable solution that will require more research and development. Regardless of future technical roadblocks, for now, it is worth pursuing.

HiPER Web Site

Lisa Zyga
Science Blogger
InventorSpot.com

If you like this article, please vote for it on DIGG, Stumble, Reddit and other great sharing sites.

Comments
Sep 24, 2007
by M. Simon (not verified)

Another Way

Here is a better way. The fusion is also aneutronic. 

 <a href="http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/mr-fusion.html">Bussard Fusion Reactor</a>
<a href="http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2006/11/easy-low-cost-no-radiation-fusion.html">Easy Low Cost No Radiation Fusion</a>

It has been funded:

<a href="http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2007/08/bussard-reactor-funded.html">Bussard Reactor Funded</a>

I have inside info that is very reliable and multiply confirmed that validates the above story. I am not at liberty to say more. Expect a public announcement from the Navy in the coming weeks.

The above reactor can burn Deuterium which is very abundant and produces lots of neutrons or it can burn a mixture of Hydrogen and Boron 11 which does not.

The implication of it is that we will know in 6 to 9 months if the small reactors of that design are feasible.

If they are we could have fusion plants generating electricity in 10 years or less depending on how much we want to spend to compress the time frame. A much better investment that CO2 sequestration.

BTW Bussard is not the only thing going on in IEC. There are a few government programs at Los Alamos National Laboratory, MIT, the University of Wisconsin and at the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana among others.

Sep 24, 2007
by Erich J. Knight (not verified)

Two Other Ways

  I thought your readers would be interested in looking at these energy technologies and EPS's theoretic base for ball lighting.

Aneutronic Fusion: Here I am not talking about the big science ITER project taking thirty years, but the several small alternative plasma fusion efforts.

There are three companies pursuing hydrogen-boron plasma toroid fusion, Paul Koloc, Prometheus II, Eric Lerner, Focus Fusion and Clint Seward of Electron Power Systems

Vincent Page (a technology officer at GE!!) gave a presentation at the 05 6th symposium on current trends in international fusion research , which high lights the need to fully fund three different approaches to P-B11 fusion

He quotes costs and time to development of P-B11 Fusion as tens of million $, and years verses the many decades and ten Billion plus $ projected for ITER and other "Big" science efforts

Here are the links:

http://www.electronpowersystems.com/  

U.S., Chilean Labs to Collaborate on Testing Scientific Feasibility of Focus Fusion http://pesn.com/2006/03/18/9600250_LPP_Chilean_Nuclear_Commission/ However, short of a Energy "silver bullet" like fusion , Here is a fully DOABLE technology

Time to Master the Carbon Cycle with Terra Preta Soil Technology;
The integrated energy strategy offered by Charcoal based Terra Preta Soil technology may
provide the only path to sustain our agricultural and fossil fueled power
structure without climate degradation, other than nuclear power.The economics look good, and truly great if we had CO2 cap & trade in place:
Terra Preta soils I feel has great possibilities to revolutionize sustainable agriculture into a major CO2 sequestration strategy.I thought the current news and links on Terra Preta soils and closed-loop pyrolysis would interest you. SCIAM Article May 15 07http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=5670236C-E7F2-99DF-3E2163B9FB144E40After many years of reviewing solutions to anthropogenic global warming (AGW) I believe this technology can manage Carbon for the greatest collective benefit at the lowest economic price, on vast scales. It just needs to be seen by ethical globally minded companies.Even with all the big corporations coming to the GHG negotiation table, like Exxon, Alcoa, .etc, we still need to keep watch as they try to influence how carbon management is legislated in the USA. Carbon must have a fair price, that fair price and the changes in the view of how the soil carbon cycle now can be used as a massive sink verses it now being viewed as a wash, will be of particular value to farmers and a global cool breath of fresh air for us all. If you have any other questions please feel free to call me or visit the TP web site I've been drafted to co-administer.  http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/?q=nodeIt has been immensely gratifying to see all the major players join the mail list , Cornell folks, T. Beer of Kings Ford Charcoal (Clorox), Novozyne the M-Roots guys(fungus),  chemical engineers, Dr. Danny Day of EPRIDA , Dr. Antal of U. of H., Virginia Tech folks  and probably many others who's back round I don't know have joined.Also Here is the Latest BIG Terra Preta Soil news; ConocoPhillips Establishes $22.5 Million Pyrolysis Program at Iowa State    04/10/07Mechabolic , a pyrolysis machine built in the form of a giant worm to eat solid waste and product char & fuel at the "Burning Man" festival  ;     http://whatiamupto.com/mechabolic/index.html  Erich J. Knight
540-289-9750
shengar at aol.com

Sep 27, 2007
by Darkflame (not verified)

progress is good.

Short term, we need more Fission, Long term we need more renewables, But Fusion we need forever.

 That said, 30% from the sun as a optimistic maximum is a bit low.

After all, the sun has basicaly supplied all the energy for the earths life thus far, we just 

have to get better at catching it ;)