I don't smoke anymore. Sure I've had a puff or two, but my serious smoking days are over. I quit cold-turkey. Dropped the habit in an instant and never went back.
And this was before the shift in emphasis from "relax with a smoke" to "smoking will kill you."
The advertising trends in smoking are, to me at least, absolutely hilarious. What started as a huge promotional campaign to help get people addicted to a product is now going rapidly extinct.
My initial idea was to find examples of vintage cigarette ads, then compare the new ad campaigns with the idea of showing how current trends (and technology) have shifted focus.
It was a good idea-but not entirely possible. Philip Morris has accomplished the impossible: Rally the media against their own product while still spending tons of money marketing that very same product.
But the ads have taken a different turn. Print, TV, and other media have given way to more subtle advertising methods.
Let's take Camel, for example. The primary reason I'm picking this brand is because they still actively promote their product. When it comes to advertising, they're sort'a the McDonald's of cigarettes.
Camel Cigarettes, 1937- This is what I think Hell looks like...Oh, yeah. Nothing helps me digest more than a stick full of carcinogens. And check out the picture. It's like the guy is burning books Ray Bradbury Fahrenheit 451 style. To me the ad says, "Welcome to Hell. Have a smoke."
Then there's this one:
Camel Cigarettes, 1946
Yeah, that's a doc I'll go to. He'd deliver the baby, all the while tapping ashes on the floor. No thanks.
While those ads show the innocence of each era, they kind of creep me out. Each ad has a success story about the proud, hardworking individual who enjoys a nice, smooth Camel.
These ads openly address the process of smoking, the idea that smoking is cool, and the "benefits" of smoking.
Compare that notion to the new batch of Camel ads:
Camel Cigarette Ads, 2009
Do you see a cigarette anywhere in any of the ads above? Is there anything telling you how great it is to smoke a cigarette-or how smoking aids in digestion?
These ads count on brand/logo recognition. And instead of saying how great cigarettes are, they bare a slogan that cannot in anyway be considered a positive selling point:
Tobacco Seriously Damages Health
Um... Could someone tell me how this works as a successful ad campaign, because just trying to figure it out gives me a headache.
And that mentality seems to be crossing the entire realm of advertising for cigarettes. Let's take Marlboro for example:
This guy likes Marlboro so much that he tattooed the logo on his hand.
Marlboro took smoking in a new, manly direction, culminating in one of the most famous ad campaigns ever.
Ahhhh... Flavor Country.
Most of us remember this guy. Tough. Manly. Smoker.
The Marlboro Man campaign was so popular that it is still emulated today.
Burger King. And yep. That's a fry.