Since Web 2.0 is now passing its 5th year anniversary, there is enough
data to assess just how much of an impact social media has had on our
lives. While there are still those who believe it's nothing more than a
passing fancy, a fad, the Studio 54 of our day...one cannot deny the
numbers. Statistics don't lie and Kagan, Fisch, McLeod & Qualman
are here to prove it so!
For those naysayers and non-believers, several social media gurus have been hard at work data-mining the facts to prove their case. The Social Media Revolution is alive and well and demonstrating everyday just how many rank-and-file netizens are goose-stepping to its drumbeat.
Marta KaganLast year, Marta Kagan, managing director for Espresso (an integrated
What the F**k is Social Media?marketing agency) helped solve this problem with her presentation, boldly titled "What the F**k is Social Media?" It was critiqued a social media success for its humor and the convincing case it made regarding the power of social media.
With the tremendous growth of Twitter, Facebook, and blogging in the last year, Ms. Kagan felt with the evolution of social media moving so fast, a sequel was in order. And of course she was right on target. The stats she cites and the insights she surfaces are simply amazing. Check out her presentation here: "What the "F**k is Social Media: One Year Later!"
"Did You Know - 2008 Latest Edition" by educators Karl Fisch, and Scott McLeod is an updated
Karl Fisch & Scott McLeodversion of a 2007 presentation titled "Shift Happens." While somewhat US-centric, it does provide global stats on the Information Age and became an authoritative data source for Sony BMG at their executive meeting held in Rome in 2008.
Erik QualmanOn July 30, 2009, Erik Qualman, the global VP of online marketing for EF Education, headquartered in Lucerne, Switzerland updated some of the research completed by Kagan, Fisch and McLeod. Posting to his Socialnomics blog designed to cover the latest news and trends in social media, his presentation called the "Social Media Revolution" provides startling statistics from a vast amount of collated research.
And if you want to use some of these stats for your own research and couldn't write fast enough, here is a complete list of the statistics noted in the video:
While its important to debate the pros and cons of social media, as I have myself in previous blogs, its also important to pay heed to the statistics. While pure data of this sort always needs to be analyzed and assessed, until you have the actual numbers, you are unable to make any assumptions.
Bottom line, I have to agree with Qualman and his belief that the above statistics “ tell the story that social media isn’t a fad... it’s a fundamental shift in the way we communicate." And that paradigm shift is underscored by the fact that we no longer need to search for the news... the news finds us! We are all part of a user-generated society, now in control of our own destinies. And the numbers substantiate that fact!
Ron Callari
Society and Trends Writer
InventorSpot.com

If you like this article, could you please send it to a friend, or send out a Tweet, or Stumble it?
Have you seen these great articles:
READ: Job Seeker's Guide to Social Media Tools and Apps
READ: Awesome Collection of I Hate Your Guts Type Gifts
READ: 15 Absolutely Awful Valentine's Presents
READ: 10 Ways to Really Piss Off Your Woman
READ: 10 Great Gadgets for Hurting Hands
by Anonymous
Great article...
Just posted it on our facebook page http://facebook.com/conceptbakery
by Anonymous
Wikipedia
Where are the studies showing that Wikipedia is more accurate than Britannica?
Tom Panelas
Encyclopaedia Britannica
by Ron Callari
Wikipedia vs. Britannica
Here is one report:
http://tinyurl.com/l7kcbs
Ron Callari is a freelance journalist and editorial cartoonist. His slighlty off-center published work includes trends, social media, politics, travel, humor and political articles.
Follow Ron on the InventorSpot and Twitter.com/roncallari
by Anonymous
Wikipedia vs. Britannica
That's not a study; it's a snarky blog post reporting claims by Wikipedia editors of errors in Britannica.
Tom Panelas
by Anonymous
Caution: Socialnomics video contains a lot of bogus statistics
Ron,
I would strongly recommend that people do not promote or share the Socialnomics video until Mr. Qualman has cleaned up several grossly inaccurate statistics. Here is my blog post on the subject: http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/social-media/socialnomics-should-not-be-...
You may also want to check the list of "facts" and associated citations that Qualman provided on his blog (and that you included above.) In many cases, the content of the data presented and/or the source is highly questionable.
Others have no defined source : #9, #13,
or are opinions: #15, #20, #25, #34
Or are mislisted: #36, #37
Plus, two real classics, #10 & #32, where the text in the reference blog post you used is different from the statement in the video.
It is a shame that an opportunity to educate so many (the video has over 375,000 views to date) on the tremendous benefits of social media is buried in a presentation that clearly illustrates the weaknesses of social media - journalistic inaccuracies, hyperbole, and questionable regard for intellectual property.
I am not a social media naysayer, I am a social media evangelist. Social media deserves much better treatment than this.